Not to downplay the suffering caused by such operators in any way — there have been multiple suicides related to such cases — but those lone wolves are rank amateurs compared with the massive network of fraudulent accounts that catfish male victims using stolen photos of young women and adolescent girls. They knew that the accounts were fake because the photos had been stolen from Instagram accounts or personal Facebook profiles. Some of the fake accounts are massive: they have ,, ,, or even , followers. It starts with a friend request from a young, hot babe. Within minutes of an intended victim accepting the request, the fake account will invite the target to join her in a sexy webcam chat, such as on Skype or Google Hangouts. Once they do, the first step into a sextortion trap has been taken. Yates, in the Radio-Canada web series Corde sensible, paraphrases a typical sextortion threat:. That worked quite well, Tremblay said:. Private conversations soon ensued.
Sign up to get your own personalized Reddit experience!
Leave a comment
A few nights ago, my daughter was being hilarious. She dumped over two laundry baskets of clean laundry that part was slightly annoying , and then she got on top of the baskets and did a little dance. Since both of my children tend to shed clothing when they're at home, she was wearing only underpants and some leg warmers.
X-RATED photos are being shared by hundreds of people on a Facebook group in which anyone including children could join. Entitled "UK Sexy Singles Come and Mingle", the group initially seems like an innocent place for single people across Britain to meet others. Please post an introduction when you join so people can interact with you. However one insider has told how while the group advertises itself as a place for people to meet and begin meaningful relationships, the group is actually a "non-stop stream of porn which anyone can join". The insider added: "I joined the group with a blank profile, no picture, no nothing.
In her version, another young girl in the same bathing suit was the one doing the pantsing. Facebook pulled the picture and blocked the user from the site for 24 hours, prompting a chorus of complaints citing the artistic merit of the photo. The removal comes just a few weeks after the social media network reversed their previous policy and decided to allow photos of breastfeeding on the site, responding to years of protest from mothers and feminists. Facebook presumably imposes those rules in order to try to protect minors from child pornographers who troll various social media sites to collect such pictures. So where does Facebook draw the line? In fact, the company has maintained strict regulations about nudity in general in an attempt to create a bright line between pictures and porn. Breastfeeding is one of the few exceptions. This year, after angry users flooded Facebook with over 60, tweets and 5, emails arguing that breastfeeding is part of life and Facebook was shaming women from performing the natural act by censoring their pictures, Facebook caved and allowed such photos to be posted to the site. And late last year, the social network posted its policy about mastectomy photos after more than 20, signed a petition asking Facebook to stop censoring these types of images.